ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Clinical characteristics in the misdiagnosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis: A retrospective analysis of eight patients.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human Cytomegalovirus Associated Neuropathies: A Comprehensive Review From Pathophysiology to Clinical and Therapeutic Considerations.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To highlight characteristics in the misdiagnosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR). Methods: Misdiagnosed cases related to CMVR were analyzed retrospectively at the Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Youan Hospital, from July 2017 to October 2019. The medical records were reviewed by two independent senior ophthalmologists and the patients' clinical characteristics were analyzed. Results: Eight patients (16 eyes) were identified with misdiagnoses related to CMVR. Six of the patients with CMVR were previously unaware of their human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection; one patient with CMVR concealed their history of HIV infection. The cases were initially misdiagnosed as diabetic retinopathy (1/7, 14.3%), branch retinal vein occlusion (1/7, 14.3%), ischemic optic neuropathy (1/7, 14.3%), Behçet's disease (1/7, 14.3%), iridocyclitis (2/7, 28.6%), and progressive outer retinal necrosis (1/7, 14.3%). One patient with binocular renal retinopathy and chronic renal insufficiency was misdiagnosed with CMVR. Four eyes (4/16, 25%) presented with pan-retinal involvement. Fourteen eyes (14/16, 87.5%) had optic disc or macular area involvement. At the final diagnosis, one patient was blind, and two patients had low vision. Seven AIDS patients showed an extremely low level of CD4 Conclusion: CMVR may be misdiagnosed in the absence of known immune suppression. CMVR and HIV screening cannot be overlooked if a young male patient presents with yellowish-white retinal lesions. These misdiagnosed patients had severe retinitis associated with poor vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.