Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36189776›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2023

The who and how of attentional bias in cannabis users: associations with use severity, craving and interference control.

Emese Kroon, Lauren Kuhns, Annette Dunkerbeck, Janna Cousijn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Similarities and Differences in Psychology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emese KroonNeuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-9336
Lauren KuhnsNeuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-8905
Annette DunkerbeckDimence, SCOS, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Janna CousijnNeuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7699-2582
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLDimence · NL

Funding

The Role of Motivation and Control in Cannabis Use Disorders: A Cross-Cultural Longitudinal Neuroimaging StudyR01DA042490 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI COUSIJN, JANNA, FILBEY, FRANCESCA · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCognitive and motivational processes are thought to underlie cannabis use disorder (CUD), but research assessing how cognitive processes [e.g. interference control (IC)] interact with implicit [e.g. attentional bias (AB)] and explicit motivation (i.e. craving) is lacking. We assessed the presence of AB in cannabis users with varying use severity and tested models of moderation, mediation and moderated mediation to assess how AB, craving and IC interact in their association with measures of cannabis use.

designA cross-sectional study design was used. SETTING AND

participantsEight studies performed by our laboratory in the Netherlands including never-sporadic, occasional (≤ 1/month) and regular cannabis users (≥ 2/week), and individuals in treatment for CUD were combined (n = 560; 71% male). MEASUREMENTS: Studies included a classic Stroop task (IC), a cannabis Stroop task (AB) and measures of session-induced and average session craving. Both heaviness of cannabis use (grams/week) and severity of use related problems were included.

findingsOnly those in treatment for CUD showed an AB to cannabis (P = 0.019) and group differences were only observed when comparing CUD with never-sporadic users (P = 0.007). In occasional and regular users, IC was negatively associated with heaviness (β = 0.015, P < 0.001), but not severity of use. Average session craving (exploratory), but not session-induced craving (confirmatory), mediated this association between AB and heaviness (β = 0.050, P = 0.011) as well as severity of use (β = 0.083, P = 0.009); higher AB was associated with heavier use and more severe problems through increased craving.

conclusionsAttentional bias only appears to be present in cannabis users with the most severe problems and craving appears to mediate the association between attentional bias and both heaviness and severity of use in occasional and regular users. The association of interference control with heaviness but not severity of use may point to subacute intoxication effects of cannabis use on interference control.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasCannabisMarijuana AbuseCravingCross-Sectional StudiesCuesFemaleHumansMaleAttentional biascannabis usecognitioncravinginterference controlmotivation

Identifiers

PMID36189776
PMCPMC10091751
OpenAlexW4300427200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.