Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36189481›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2022

Online control of the False Discovery Rate in group-sequential platform trials.

Sonja Zehetmayer, Martin Posch, Franz Koenig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.Statistical methods in medical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ADDIS-Graphs for Online Error Control With Application to Platform Trials.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Online multiple hypothesis testing.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sonja ZehetmayerCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6863-7997
Martin PoschCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Franz KoenigCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When testing multiple hypotheses, a suitable error rate should be controlled even in exploratory trials. Conventional methods to control the False Discovery Rate assume that all

Indexed as

interim analysisLOND procedureMultiple hypothesis testingspending function

Identifiers

PMID36189481
PMCPMC10130539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.