ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2022
Efficacy optimization of low frequency microbubble-mediated sonoporation as a drug delivery platform to cancer cells.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Frequency Ultrasound Enhances Cavitation of Microdroplets for Controlled Scaffold Porosity in Tissue Engineering.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-mediated targeted micro/nanobubbles: breaking new boundaries in precision tumor therapy.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Progress and Application of Multifunctional Ultrasound Theranostic Agents.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Volumetric Nanodroplet-Enhanced Ultrasound Surgery Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition as a Cancer Therapy Platform.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- The Compression-Dominated Ultrasound Response of Poly(ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Volumetric Passive Acoustic Mapping and Cavitation Detection of Nanobubbles under Low-Frequency Insonation.ACS materials Au · 2025Article
- Smart Ultrasound-responsive Polymers for Drug Delivery: An Overview on Advanced Stimuli-sensitive Materials and Techniques.Current drug delivery · 2025Review
- Diameter-dependent assessment of microvascular leakage following ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.iScience · 2023Article
- Manipulation with sound and vibration: A review on the micromanipulation system based on sub-MHz acoustic waves.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Review
- Effects of medium viscoelasticity on bubble collapse strength of interacting polydisperse bubbles.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- The role of acoustofluidics and microbubble dynamics for therapeutic applications and drug delivery.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound insonation of microbubbles can be used to form pores in cell membranes and facilitate the local trans-membrane transport of drugs and genes. An important factor in efficient delivery is the size of the delivered target compared to the generated membrane pores. Large molecule delivery remains a challenge, and can affect the resulting therapeutic outcomes. To facilitate large molecule delivery, large pores need to be formed. While ultrasound typically uses megahertz frequencies, it was recently shown that when microbubbles are excited at a frequency of 250 kHz (an order of magnitude below the resonance frequency of these agents), their oscillations are significantly enhanced as compared to the megahertz range. Here, to promote the delivery of large molecules, we suggest using this low frequency and inducing large pore formation through the high-amplitude oscillations of microbubbles. We assessed the impact of low frequency microbubble-mediated sonoporation on breast cancer cell uptake by optimizing the delivery of 4 fluorescent molecules ranging from 1.2 to 70 kDa in size. The optimal ultrasound peak negative pressure was found to be 500 kPa. Increasing the pressure did not enhance the fraction of fluorescent cells, and in fact reduced cell viability. For the smaller molecule sizes, 1.2 kDa and 4 kDa, the groups treated with an ultrasound pressure of 500 kPa and MB resulted in a fraction of 58% and 29% of fluorescent cells respectively, whereas delivery of 20 kDa and 70 kDa molecules yielded 10% and 5%, respectively. These findings suggest that low-frequency (e.g., 250 kHz) insonation of microbubbles results in high amplitude oscillation in vitro that increase the uptake of large molecules. Successful ultrasound-mediated molecule delivery requires the careful selection of insonation parameters to maximize the therapeutic effect by increasing cell uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.