Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36189425›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022

BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination uptake, safety, effectiveness and waning in children and young people aged 12-17 years in Scotland.

Igor Rudan, Tristan Millington, Karen Antal, Zoe Grange, Lynda Fenton, Christopher Sullivan, Audrey Buelo, Rachael Wood, Lana Woolford, Olivia V Swann and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Caveats in reporting of national vaccine uptake.Journal of global health · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Igor RudanUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tristan MillingtonUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Karen AntalPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Zoe GrangePublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Lynda FentonPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Christopher SullivanPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Audrey BueloPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Rachael WoodUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lana WoolfordUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Olivia V SwannDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Josephine L K MurrayPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Lucy A CullenPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Emily MoorePublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Fasih HaiderUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Fatima AlmaghrabiUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jim McMenaminPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Utkarsh AgrawalSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Syed Ahmar ShahUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Steven KerrUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Colin R SimpsonSchool of Health, Wellington Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Sir Lewis D RitchieAcademic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Chris RobertsonPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Sir Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Public Health Scotland · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GBVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19004Medical Research Council MC_PC_19075Medical Research Council MC_PC_20058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The two-dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine has demonstrated high efficacy against COVID-19 disease in clinical trials of children and young people (CYP). Consequently, we investigated the uptake, safety, effectiveness and waning of the protective effect of the BNT162b2 against symptomatic COVID-19 in CYP aged 12-17 years in Scotland. Methods: The analysis of the vaccine uptake was based on information from the Turas Vaccination Management Tool, inclusive of Mar 1, 2022. Vaccine safety was evaluated using national data on hospital admissions and General Practice (GP) consultations, through a self-controlled case series (SCCS) design, investigating 17 health outcomes of interest. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic COVID-19 disease for Delta and Omicron variants was estimated using a test-negative design (TND) and S-gene status in a prospective cohort study using the Scotland-wide Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II) surveillance platform. The waning of the VE following each dose of BNT162b2 was assessed using a matching process followed by conditional logistic regression. Findings: Between Aug 6, 2021 and Mar 1, 2022, 75.9% of the 112,609 CYP aged 16-17 years received the first and 49.0% the second COVID-19 vaccine dose. Among 237,681 CYP aged 12-15 years, the uptake was 64.5% and 37.2%, respectively. For 12-17-year-olds, BNT162b2 showed an excellent safety record, with no increase in hospital stays following vaccination for any of the 17 investigated health outcomes. In the 16-17-year-old group, VE against symptomatic COVID-19 during the Delta period was 64.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 59.2-68.5) at 2-5 weeks after the first dose and 95.6% (77.0-99.1) at 2-5 weeks after the second dose. The respective VEs against symptomatic COVID-19 in the Omicron period were 22.8% (95% CI -6.4-44.0) and 65.5% (95% CI 56.0-73.0). In children aged 12-15 years, VE against symptomatic COVID-19 during the Delta period was 65.4% (95% CI 61.5-68.8) at 2-5 weeks after the first dose, with no observed cases at 2-5 weeks after the second dose. The corresponding VE against symptomatic COVID-19 during the Omicron period were 30.2% (95% CI 18.4-40.3) and 81.2% (95% CI 77.7-84.2). The waning of the protective effect against the symptomatic disease began after five weeks post-first and post-second dose. Interpretation: During the study period, uptake of BNT162b2 in Scotland has covered more than two-thirds of CYP aged 12-17 years with the first dose and about 40% with the second dose. We found no increased likelihood of admission to hospital with a range of health outcomes in the period after vaccination. Vaccination with both doses was associated with a substantial reduction in the risk of COVID-19 symptomatic disease during both the Delta and Omicron periods, but this protection began to wane after five weeks. Funding: UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council); Research and Innovation Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund; Chief Scientist's Office of the Scottish Government; Health Data Research UK; National Core Studies - Data and Connectivity.

Indexed as

Age group 12-15 yearsAge group 16-17 yearsBNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinationChildren and young peopleCOVID-19National prospective cohort studyScotlandUnited KingdomVaccine effectivenessVaccine safetyVaccine uptakeVaccine waning

Identifiers

PMID36189425
PMCPMC9514975
OpenAlexW4297534234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.