Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36189181›Full record

ArticleGeneral psychiatry2022

TNF-α, IL-6 and hsCRP in patients with melancholic, atypical and anxious depression: an antibody array analysis related to somatic symptoms.

Hongmei Liu, Xiaohui Wu, Yun Wang, Xiaohua Liu, Daihui Peng, Yan Wu, Jun Chen, Yun'ai Su, Jia Xu, Xiancang Ma and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03219008 (Multi-dimensional Diagnosis,Individualized Therapy,and Management Technique for Major Depressive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03219008 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Multi-dimensional Diagnosis,Individualized Therapy,and Management Technique for Major Depressive Disorder:Based on Clinical and Pathological Characteristics

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Mental Health CenterRan2017 to 2020Enrolled800ConditionsDepressive DisorderArmsFluoxetine, fluoxetine + cognitive-behavioral treatment(CBT), fluoxetine + Amfebutamone, physical treatment+fluoxetine+amfebutamone, Fluvoxamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hongmei Liu *Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohui Wu *Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yun WangClinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohua LiuClinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0413-5861
Daihui PengClinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4338-967X
Yan WuClinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jun ChenClinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3837-2761
Yun'ai SuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jia XuHarbin First Specific Hospital, Harbin, China.
Xiancang MaDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yi LiWuhan Mental Health Center, Wuhan, China.
Jianfei ShiHangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaodong YangShandong Mental Health Center, Jinan, China.
Han RongShenzhen Mental Health Center, Shenzhen, China.
Marta Di FortiDepartment of Social Genetics and Developmental Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Yiru FangClinical Research Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-9085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The association between inflammation and major depressive disorder (MDD) remains poorly understood, given the heterogeneity of patients with MDD. Aims: We investigated inflammatory markers, such as interleukin (IL)-6, high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in melancholic, atypical and anxious depression and explored whether baseline inflammatory protein levels could indicate prognosis. Methods: The sample consisted of participants (aged 18-55 years) from a previously reported multicentre randomised controlled trial with a parallel-group design registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, including melancholic (n=44), atypical (n=37) and anxious (n=44) patients with depression and healthy controls (HCs) (n=33). Subtypes of MDD were classified according to the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Rated Version and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Blood levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and hsCRP were assessed using antibody array analysis. Results: Patients with MDD, classified according to melancholic, atypical and anxious depression subtypes, and HCs did not differ significantly in baseline TNF-α, IL-6 and hsCRP levels after adjustment. In patients with anxious depression, hsCRP levels increased significantly if they experienced no pain (adjusted (adj.) p=0.010) or mild to moderate pain (adj. p=0.038) compared with those with severe pain. However, the patients with anxious depression and severe pain showed a lower trend in hsCRP levels than patients with atypical depression who experienced severe pain (p=0.022; adj. p=0.155). Baseline TNF-α (adj. p=0.038) and IL-6 (adj. p=0.006) levels in patients in remission were significantly lower than those in patients with no remission among the participants with the atypical depression subtype at the eighth-week follow-up. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of differences in inflammatory proteins in patients with varied symptoms among melancholic, atypical and anxious depression subtypes. Further studies on the immunoinflammatory mechanism underlying different subtypes of depression are expected for improved individualised therapy. Trial registration number: NCT03219008.

Indexed as

antibody arrayanxiousatypicalinflammatory markersmajor depressive disordermelancholicsomatic symptoms

Identifiers

PMID36189181
PMCPMC9462079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.