ArticleAmerican journal of stem cells2022
Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in scar treatment: a systematic review protocol.
Article in American journal of stem cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analyzing the Clinical Potential of Stromal Vascular Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in scar treatment among patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current practices and outcomes.American journal of stem cells · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is an emerging therapy that is being pioneered as a potential treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars. Up to this point, there isn't a cure for keloids and hypertrophic scars yet they comprise the commonest benign skin disorders. Despite published studies reporting potential therapeutic benefits of SVF, their use and efficacy on scar improvement are not clearly described. The aim of this review is to describe the clinical practice involved in harvesting, processing, utilization of SVF, and associated efficacy in scar treatment.
methodsWe shall include published clinical articles evaluating the efficacy of SVF on improving scar characteristics and assessment scores among adults with keloids or hypertrophic scars. Article search of Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase using Mesh terms of "scars" and "stromal vascular fraction" combined with the Boolean operators ("AND", "OR") will be performed by two independent researchers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. The primary outcome measure will be the mean difference in the Scar characteristics including Scar assessment scores, scar thickness among others. DATA SYNTHESIS: Descriptive data synthesis and mean differences between treatment arms will be calculated for the primary outcome of the scar assessment scores. In case more than three studies provide consistent characteristics of the scar assessment scores, a meta-analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION: Evidence obtained from the systematic review will form the foundation upon which further clinical trials research will be conducted in evaluating the efficacy of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in keloid and hypertrophic scar. The systematic review has been submitted to the PROSPERO database and is currently under review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36189175PMC9520234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.