Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36189026›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Biomechanical assessment of the ipsilesional upper limb in post-stroke patients during multi-joint reaching tasks: A quantitative study.

Alessandro Scano, Eleonora Guanziroli, Robert M Mira, Cristina Brambilla, Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti, Franco Molteni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro ScanoInstitute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing (STIIMA), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Milan-Lecco, Italy.
Eleonora GuanziroliVilla Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Costa Masnaga, Italy.
Robert M MiraInstitute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing (STIIMA), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Milan-Lecco, Italy.
Cristina BrambillaInstitute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing (STIIMA), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Milan-Lecco, Italy.
Lorenzo Molinari TosattiInstitute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing (STIIMA), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Milan-Lecco, Italy.
Franco MolteniVilla Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Costa Masnaga, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In hemiplegic patients with stroke, investigating the ipsilesional limb may shed light on the upper limb motor control, impairments and mechanisms of functional recovery. Usually investigation of motor impairment and rehabilitative interventions in patients are performed only based on the contralesional limb. Previous studies found that also the ipsilesional limb presents motor deficits, mostly evaluated with clinical scales which could lack of sensibility. To quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ipsilesional limb in patient with stroke, we conducted an observational study in which 49 hemiplegic patients were enrolled, divided in subgroups based on the severity of impairment of the contralesional limb, and assessed with a kinematic, dynamic and motor control evaluation protocol on their ipsilesional upper limb during reaching movements. Measurements were repeated in the acute and subacute phases and compared to healthy controls. Our results showed that the ipsilesional limb presented lower kinematic and dynamic performances with respect to the healthy controls. Patients performed the movements slower and with a reduced range of motion, indicating a difficulty in controlling the motion of the arm. The energy and the power outputs were lower in both shoulder and elbow joint with a high significance level, confirming the limitation found in kinematics. Moreover, we showed that motor deficits were higher in the acute phase with respect to the subacute one and we found higher significant differences in the group with a more severe contralesional limb impairment. Ipsilesional upper limb biomechanics adds significant and more sensible measures for assessments based on multi-joints dynamics, providing a better insight on the upper limb motor control after stroke. These results could have clinical implications while evaluating and treating ipsilesional and contralesional upper limb impairments and dysfunctions in patients with stroke.

Indexed as

biomechanicsdynamicsipsilesionalmotor controlstrokeupper-extremity

Identifiers

PMID36189026
PMCPMC9397945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.