Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Community Conversations: Stakeholder-Identified Research Priorities to Foster Community Participation for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disability.

Roxanna M Bendixen, Teal Benevides, Roger Ideishi, Robert Smythe, Joshua Taylor, Caroline Umeda, Cheryl Kerfeld, Tracy Jirikowic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Caring for People With Cancer and Physical Disabilities.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roxanna M BendixenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Teal BenevidesDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Roger IdeishiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Robert SmythePhiladelphia, PA, United States.
Joshua TaylorCollege of Education and Human Development, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United States.
Caroline UmedaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, CA, United States.
Cheryl KerfeldDivision of Physical Therapy, Seattle Public Schools, Seattle, WA, United States.
Tracy JirikowicDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify future research priorities and meaningful outcomes focused on community-level interventions for children and youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities and families, a group underrepresented in research, we established a diverse patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) community. We focused on engaging regionally and nationally-diverse stakeholders-individuals, families, healthcare professionals, community, and policy experts-in research development activities that would build partnerships and research capacity. This community of stakeholders also represented the matrix of systems, services, and programs that people frequent in their communities (e.g., cultural arts, worship, sports and recreation, and transportation). We present the engagement process and methods for including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities as stakeholders in research planning and processes. The results of planning, completing, and evaluating three face-to-face research capacity-building meetings and their subsequent stakeholder engagement activities include: (1) individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families clearly expressed a desire to be included and to feel good about their participation in community settings, (2) many of our stakeholders wanted action and change to happen in their communities now, and often did not realize or understand that research takes time, (3) organizations expressed a need for mentoring related to best practices for access and inclusive programming. Overarching issues around societal inclusion, equal opportunities, and life chances for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families were front and center across communities and multi-stakeholder groups, and achieving change remains valued and a high priority.

Indexed as

community engagementcommunity participationinclusionintellectual and developmental disabilityresearch capacity buildingstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID36188970
PMCPMC9397812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.