Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Knowledge Needs in Rehabilitation: Perspectives of Service Users and Professionals.

Salla Sipari, Mia Tammelin, Sari Helenius, Eija Janhunen, Merja Rantakokko, Nea Vänskä, Toini Harra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salla SipariCustomer-Oriented Wellbeing and Health Services, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Mia TammelinSchool of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Rehabilitation, JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Sari HeleniusCustomer-Oriented Wellbeing and Health Services, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Eija JanhunenSchool of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Rehabilitation, JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Merja RantakokkoSchool of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Rehabilitation, JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Nea VänskäSchool of Rehabilitation and Examination, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Toini HarraCustomer-Oriented Wellbeing and Health Services, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applying rehabilitation research knowledge in practice is challenging due to a gap between scientific knowledge produced by researchers and the needs of practical rehabilitation. This study describes the current and future knowledge needs of rehabilitation research from the perspectives of professionals and service users. We conducted a qualitative study with inductive content analysis from nine focus group interviews with rehabilitation stakeholders. The results show that current knowledge needs are strongly related to the meaningful and inclusive life of service users, the promotion of multi- and interprofessionalism in rehabilitation, and transdisciplinary applied research on rehabilitation. The future knowledge needs were related to the changing needs of rehabilitation and remote rehabilitation based on rapid change in society and digitalisation and on different rehabilitation practices and contexts. The results of the study can be used to enable favorable conditions for reciprocal research, development, and innovation (RDI) activities and research networks in transdisciplinary rehabilitation.

Indexed as

applied researchimplementationknowledgepracticesrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36188953
PMCPMC9397881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.