Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Brain-Computer Interface Priming for Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy: An Exploratory Case Study.

Ciarán McGeady, Aleksandra Vučković, Niraj Singh Tharu, Yong-Ping Zheng, Monzurul Alam

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07208188 (Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Rehabilitation of Upper Limbs in Early Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07208188 early_phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Rehabilitation of Upper Limbs in Early Spinal Cord Injury: Randomised Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRan2025 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI)ArmsTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tESCS) active group, Sham transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tESCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [An emerging discipline: brain-computer interfaces medicine].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ciarán McGeadyCentre for Rehabilitation Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Aleksandra VučkovićCentre for Rehabilitation Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Niraj Singh TharuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yong-Ping ZhengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Monzurul AlamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of arm and hand function is one of the most devastating consequences of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Although some residual functional neurons often pass the site of injury, recovery after SCI is extremely limited. Recent efforts have aimed to augment traditional rehabilitation by combining exercise-based training with techniques such as transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), and movement priming. Such methods have been linked with elevated corticospinal excitability, and enhanced neuroplastic effects following activity-based therapy. In the present study, we investigated the potential for facilitating tSCS-based exercise-training with brain-computer interface (BCI) motor priming. An individual with chronic AIS A cervical SCI with both sensory and motor complete tetraplegia participated in a two-phase cross-over intervention whereby they engaged in 15 sessions of intensive tSCS-mediated hand training for 1 h, 3 times/week, followed by a two week washout period, and a further 15 sessions of tSCS training with bimanual BCI motor priming preceding each session. We found using the Graded Redefined Assessment for Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension that the participant's arm and hand function improved considerably across each phase of the study: from 96/232 points at baseline, to 117/232 after tSCS training alone, and to 131/232 points after BCI priming with tSCS training, reflecting improved strength, sensation, and gross and fine motor skills. Improved motor scores and heightened perception to sharp sensations improved the neurological level of injury from C4 to C5 following training and improvements were generally maintained four weeks after the final training session. Although functional improvements were similar regardless of the presence of BCI priming, there was a moderate improvement of bilateral strength only when priming preceded tSCS training, perhaps suggesting a benefit of motor priming for tSCS training.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfacemotor primingneuromodulationrehabilitationspinal cord injurytranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36188944
PMCPMC9397879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.