Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188941›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Embedding Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Home and Community Setting: A Rapid Review.

Túlio Medina Dutra de Oliveira, Adriano Luiz Pereira, Giovani Bernardo Costa, Liliane P de Souza Mendes, Leonardo Barbosa de Almeida, Marcelo Velloso, Carla Malaguti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frailty and COPD: a bidirectional relationship in the context of systemic and accelerated ageing.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Túlio Medina Dutra de OliveiraDepartment of Cardiorespiratory and Skeletal Muscle Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Adriano Luiz PereiraDepartment of Cardiorespiratory and Skeletal Muscle Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Giovani Bernardo CostaEmpresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares/Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Liliane P de Souza MendesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Leonardo Barbosa de AlmeidaEmpresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares/Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Marcelo VellosoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Carla MalagutiDepartment of Cardiorespiratory and Skeletal Muscle Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a rapid review of the literature for the components, benefits, barriers, and facilitators of pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) people in-home and community-based settings. seventy-six studies were included: 57 home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) studies and 19 community-based pulmonary rehabilitation (CBPR) studies. The benefits of HBPR on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life were observed in one-group studies, studies comparing HBPR to usual care, and studies comparing to hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation, although the benefits were less pronounced in the latter. HBPR reduced hospital admissions compared to usual care and was more cost-effective than hospital pulmonary rehabilitation. Most HBPRs were designed with low-density or customized equipment, are minimally supervised, and have a low intensity of training. Although the HBPR has flexibility and no travel burden, participants with severe disease, physical frailty, and complex comorbidities had barriers to complying with HBPR. The telerehabilitation program, a facilitator for HBPR, is feasible and safe. CBPR was offered in-person supervision, despite being limited to physical therapists in most studies. Benefits in exercise capacity were shown in almost all studies, but the improvement in health-related quality of life was controversial. Patients reported the benefits that facilities where they attended the CBPR including social support and the presence of an instructor. They also reported barriers, such as poor physical condition, transport difficulties, and family commitments. Despite the minimal infrastructure offered, HBPR and CBPR are feasible, safe, and provide clinical benefits to patients with COPD. Home and community settings are excellent opportunities to expand the offer of pulmonary rehabilitation programs, as long as they follow protocols that ensure quality and safety following current guidelines.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasecommunity healthhome care servicespulmonary rehabilitationtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36188941
PMCPMC9397727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.