Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188919›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Public and Patient Involvement in Doctoral Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reflections on the Process, Challenges, Impact and Experiences From the Perspectives of Adults With Cerebral Palsy and the Doctoral Researcher.

Manjula Manikandan, Kevin Foley, Jessica Gough, Sarah Harrington, Éabha Wall, Fiona Weldon, Jennifer M Ryan, Claire Kerr, Aisling Walsh, Jennifer Fortune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Public Involvement in Doctoral Research Using a Four-Dimensional Theoretical Framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. PPIE in a technical research study: Using public involvement to refine the concept and understanding and move towards a multidimensional concept of disability.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Research Buddy partnership in a MD-PhD program: lessons learned.Research involvement and engagement · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Manjula ManikandanDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Kevin FoleyPublic and Patient Involvement Contributor, Ireland.
Jessica GoughPublic and Patient Involvement Contributor, Ireland.
Sarah HarringtonPublic and Patient Involvement Contributor, Ireland.
Éabha WallPublic and Patient Involvement Contributor, Ireland.
Fiona WeldonPublic and Patient Involvement Contributor, Ireland.
Jennifer M RyanDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Claire KerrSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Aisling WalshDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Jennifer FortuneDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral palsy (CP) is a lifelong condition, where people may experience complications as they age. Including the views of people with CP through Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) ensures that research into the condition is relevant and meaningful in addressing their concerns. However, there is a lack of evidence on incorporating the voices of adults with CP in the doctoral research process. Therefore, this paper aims to provide an overview of how adults with CP were involved in a doctoral research process during the pandemic. Methods: This paper describes the PPI process and its impact at various stages of the doctoral research process and reflects on the experiences from the perspective of the doctoral researcher and adults with CP using the INVOLVE Values and Principles framework. Five adults with CP were consulted throughout the doctoral research programme. The data for this paper is a combination of reflection notes, email exchanges, meeting minutes and informal discussions with the PPI team on their experiences of being involved in the PPI process. The content of this paper is informed by GRIPP 2 checklist. Results: The doctoral researcher and adult reflections highlighted the value of collaboration and the positive impact on research at each stage of the doctoral research process. Although meetings were adapted due to the pandemic, the values of PPI were adhered to throughout the doctoral research. Conclusion: Involving adults with CP positively impacted the doctoral research process. It is recommended to consider individual access needs to ensure meetings and information are accessible for disabled adults. Our reflective findings and recommendations may help other researchers who plan to involve adults with CP in doctoral research.

Indexed as

adultscerebral palsyCOVID-19doctoral researchperspectivePublic and Patient Involvement (PPI)

Identifiers

PMID36188919
PMCPMC9397843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.