Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188906›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Phantom Sensations Influenced by Global and Local Modifications of the Prosthetic Socket as a Potential Solution for Natural Somatosensory Feedback During Walking: A Preliminary Study of a Single Case.

Lisa Bachini, Stéphane Liszez, Serge Mesure, Claire Mahé, Amélie Touillet, Isabelle Loiret, Jean Paysant, Jozina B De Graaf

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07666204 (Using Sensorimotor Reorganization Following Upper Limb Amputation to Improve Prosthetic Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07666204 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Using Sensorimotor Reorganization Following Upper Limb Amputation to Improve Prosthetic Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnion de Gestion des Etablissements des Caisses d'Assurance Maladie - Nord EstRan2026 to 2030Enrolled50ConditionsAmputation of Upper Limb, Agenesis of Upper LimbArmsCaracterisation, Mapping, Phantom sensations, Classification, Prosthetic control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa BachiniAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Stéphane LiszezLagarrigue Orthopédie, Centre Prothétique Houradou, Marseille, France.
Serge MesureAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Claire MahéAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Amélie TouilletIRR Louis Pierquin, UGECAM Nord-Est, Nancy, France.
Isabelle LoiretIRR Louis Pierquin, UGECAM Nord-Est, Nancy, France.
Jean PaysantIRR Louis Pierquin, UGECAM Nord-Est, Nancy, France.
Jozina B De GraafAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following lower limb amputation, amputees are trained to walk with a prosthesis. The loss of a lower limb deprives them of essential somatosensory information, which is one of the causes of the difficulties of walking with a prosthesis. We here explored whether a solution to this lack of somatosensory feedback could come from natural sensations of the phantom limb, present in most amputees, instead of from substitutive technologies. Indeed, it is known that phantom sensations can be modulated by (i) global mechanical characteristics of the prosthesis socket, and (ii) locally applying a stimulus on an area of the residual limb. The purpose of this pilot study was to verify the feasibility of influencing phantom sensations

Indexed as

amputationgaitinterfacelower limbprosthetic socketreferred phantom sensationssensory feedback

Identifiers

PMID36188906
PMCPMC9397806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.