ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2021
Prehabilitation for Frail Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: Lessons Learnt From a Randomised Feasibility Study.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of exercise interventions on functional outcomes in frail adults with a previous or current diagnosis of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Pooled it
- Prehabilitation for colon cancer surgery: a systematic review of quality-of-life outcomes and a feasibility study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Pooled it
- Rationales for Prehabilitation Programs in Patients Preparing for Oncologic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Prehabilitation in Frail Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Evaluating the therapeutic quality of prehabilitation programmes in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of Prehabilitation in cancer patients: an Rcts systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Prehabilitation Prior to Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Impact and Implementation.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Multimodal Prehabilitation in Colorectal Cancer Surgery-A Narrative State-of-the-Art Review of Research and Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Multicomponent prehabilitation and perioperative care in older persons with frailty referred to planned orthopaedic surgery: A feasibility study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Prehabilitation for muscle wasting in cancer: do definitions matter?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Review
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in Colorectal Cancer: Improving Fitness, Lifestyle, and Post-Surgery Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients into routine health care: a realist review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators to smartwatch-based prehabilitation participation among frail surgery patients: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Frailty and Colorectal Surgery: Review and Concept of Cancer Frailty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is substantial interest by clinicians to improve the health outcomes of older and frail patients following major surgery, with prehabilitation a potential and important component of future standard patient care. We studied the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of pre-operative prehabilitation in frail patients scheduled for colorectal surgery in regional Australia. We conducted a single blind, parallel arm, randomised controlled trial in a regional referral centre where colorectal surgical patients aged over 50 were invited to participate and screened for frailty. Frail patients were randomised to undertake either a 4-week supervised exercise program with dietary advice, or usual care. The primary outcome was 6-min-walk-distance at baseline, pre-surgery (4 weeks later) and at follow-up (4-6 weeks post-operation). Secondary outcomes included physical activity level, health-related quality of life, and post-surgical complications. Feasibility outcomes were numbers of patients reaching each stage and barriers or reasons for withdrawal. Of 106 patients eligible for screening during the 2-year study period, only five were able to be randomised, of which one alone completed the entire study to follow-up. Fewer patients than expected met the frailty criteria (23.6%), and many (22.6%) were offered surgery in a shorter timeframe than the required 4 weeks. Physical and psychological aspects of frailty and logistical issues were key for patients declining study participation and/or not complying with the intervention and/or all outcome assessments. Feasibility for a large randomised controlled trial of prehabilitation for frail colorectal patients was poor (~5%) for our regional location. Addressing barriers, examination of a large, dense population base, and utilisation of a frailty-screening tool validated in surgical patients are necessary for future studies to identify the impact of prehabilitation for frail patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.