Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188782›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2021

Countries Response for People With Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

L H Lugo-Agudelo, Maria A Spir Brunal, Ana M Posada Borrero, Kelly M Cruz Sarmiento, Juan C Velasquez Correa, Rosarita Di Dio Castagna Iannini, Manuela Gonzalez Zuluaga, Victor A Ospina, Daniel F Patiño Lugo, Luisa F Mesa Franco and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L H Lugo-AgudeloUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Maria A Spir BrunalUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Ana M Posada BorreroUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Kelly M Cruz SarmientoUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Juan C Velasquez CorreaUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rosarita Di Dio Castagna IanniniUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Manuela Gonzalez ZuluagaUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Victor A OspinaUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Daniel F Patiño LugoUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Luisa F Mesa FrancoUniversity of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Christoph GutenbrunnerHannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Universidad de Antioquia · COMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: During the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, isolation and prevention measures to reduce COVID-19 contagions are essential for the care of all people; these measures should comply with the principles of inclusion and accessibility for people with disabilities (PWD), with all kinds of deficiencies and levels of dependency. Thereby, the aim of this article is to present the measures adopted for PWD or people with rehabilitation needs, for containment, mitigation, or suppression of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in different countries of all continents and of all income levels. Methods: A narrative approach was used in this article. First, a broad search was carried out in the 193 member states of the UN, and then 98 countries that issued any document, report, or information related to disability and COVID-19 were selected. Finally, 32 countries were included in this article because they presented official information. We considered official sources, the information available in the government, or on the health ministry page of the country. In this way, the countries that presented information which did not correspond to an official source were excluded. The search was conducted in August 2020 and updated in March 2021. Results: First, the non-pharmacological general interventions for PWD included informative measures and general recommendations during the stay at home, isolation, and biosecurity measures, contagion prevention, detection of positive cases, mobilization measures, and measures implemented in institutions or residences of PWD. Second, we identified the economic and social benefits provided to PWD during the pandemic. Finally, we identified the measures taken by countries according to the type of impairment (visual, hearing, physical, mental, and cardiopulmonary impairment) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, only 50% of countries from the five world regions created and implemented specific measures for PWD to containment, mitigation, or suppression of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. There is very little specific information available about the measures to continue with the care of people with rehabilitation needs and the long-term follow-up of PWD, and for the prevention and response to violence, especially for women with disabilities.

Indexed as

COVID-19disabilitypeople with disabilityrehabilitation needsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36188782
PMCPMC9397944
OpenAlexW4210798037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.