Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188648›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicine and life2022

Tuberculosis of the eye, case series study.

Zeena Adnan Abd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zeena Adnan AbdSurgery Department, Ophthalmology Unit, School of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis of the eye represents a challenge throughout the world, and there is a continuous debate about its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. The present research represents an interventional prospective study focusing on the variable clinical presentations, and the diagnostic and therapeutic characteristics of ocular tuberculosis. Fifteen eyes from nine cases were diagnosed with ocular tuberculosis, treated, and followed up between 2010 and 2020. The diagnosis was based on (1) a compatible clinical picture, (2) highly positive Tuberculin skin test or a positive IGRA test (Interferon-Gamma Release Assays), (3) a dramatic response to anti-tuberculous drugs without systemic steroid. Mean age was 41.22±13.64 years; eight cases were females 89.8%, one male 11.1%. Only one case had preexisting pulmonary tuberculosis. Bilateral ocular involvement occurred in two thirds of cases (66.7%). The most common clinical presentation was intermediate uveitis (33.3%), followed by multifocal choroiditis (20%). All cases were cured without relapse for the 2-10 years of follow-up, after taking oral anti-tuberculous drugs for 6-12 months. No systemic steroids were given, only topical steroid drops, as indicated. In conclusion, ocular tuberculosis is a mysterious condition with a wide-range of clinical presentations and should be considered in the differential diagnoses of any type of intraocular inflammation, or any unexplained reduction in vision. Oral anti-tuberculous drugs with or without topical steroids are sufficient to improve vision, produce, cure, and prevent relapse.

Indexed as

TuberculosisTuberculosis, OcularAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceTuberculin Testanti-tuberculous drugsATT – Anti tuberculous treatmentBCG – Bacillus-Calmette-GuerinchoroiditisELISA – Enzyme linked immunosorbent assayF – FemaleIGRA – Interferon-gamma release assayIOP – Intraocular pressureM – MaleOCT – Optical coherence tomographyocular tuberculosisPCR – Polymerase chain reactionTB – TuberculosisTST – Tuberculin skin testuveitis

Identifiers

PMID36188648
PMCPMC9514815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.