Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188626›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

An Italian multicentre distributed data research network to study the use, effectiveness, and safety of immunosuppressive drugs in transplant patients: Framework and perspectives of the CESIT project.

Valeria Belleudi, Alessandro C Rosa, Marco Finocchietti, Francesca R Poggi, Maria Lucia Marino, Marco Massari, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Lucia Masiero, Andrea Ricci, Gaia Bedeschi and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Valeria BelleudiDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro C RosaDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Marco FinocchiettiDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Francesca R PoggiDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Maria Lucia MarinoDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Marco MassariNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Stefania Spila AlegianiNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Lucia MasieroItalian National Transplant Center-Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Andrea RicciItalian National Transplant Center-Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Gaia BedeschiItalian National Transplant Center-Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Francesca PuotiItalian National Transplant Center-Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Massimo CardilloItalian National Transplant Center-Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Silvia PierobonAzienda Zero of the Veneto Region, Padua, Italy.
Maurizio NordioAzienda Zero of the Veneto Region, Padua, Italy.
Eliana FerroniAzienda Zero of the Veneto Region, Padua, Italy.
Martina ZanforliniARIA, S.p.a., Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe PiccoloRegional Transplant Coordination, Milan, Italy.
Olivia LeoneDirectorate General for Health, Milan, Italy.
Stefano LeddaGeneral Directorate for Health, Sardinia Region, Italy.
Paolo CartaGeneral Directorate for Health, Sardinia Region, Italy.
Donatella GarauGeneral Directorate for Health, Sardinia Region, Italy.
Ersilia LucenteforteDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marina DavoliDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Antonio AddisDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
CESIT Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of post-transplant immunosuppressive drug therapy is to prevent organ rejection while minimizing drug toxicities. In clinical practice, a multidrug approach is commonly used and involves drugs with different mechanisms of action, including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (tacrolimus or cyclosporine), antimetabolite (antimet) (mycophenolate or azathioprine), inhibitors of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) (sirolimus or everolimus), and/or steroids. Although evidence based on several randomized clinical trials is available, the optimal immunosuppressive therapy has not been established and may vary among organ transplant settings. To improve the knowledge on this topic, a multiregional research network to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of Immunosuppressive drugs in Transplant patients (CESIT) has been created with the financial support of the Italian Medicines Agency. In this article, we describe the development of this network, the framework that was designed to perform observational studies, and we also give an overview of the preliminary results that we have obtained. A multi-database transplant cohort was enrolled using a common data model based on healthcare claims data of four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio, and Sardinia). Analytical datasets were created using an open-source tool for distributed analysis. To link the National Transplant Information System to the regional transplant cohorts, a semi-deterministic record linkage procedure was performed. Overall, 6,914 transplant patients from 2009-19 were identified: 4,029 (58.3%) for kidney, 2,219 (32.1%) for liver, 434 (6.3%) for heart, and 215 (3.1%) for lung. As expected, demographic and clinical characteristics showed considerable variability among organ settings. Although the triple therapy in terms of CNI + antimet/mTOR + steroids was widely dispensed for all settings (63.7% for kidney, 33.5% for liver, 53.3% for heart, and 63.7% for lung), differences in the active agents involved were detected. The CESIT network represents a great opportunity to study several aspects related to the use, safety, and effectiveness of post-transplant maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in real practice.

Indexed as

distributed analysisimmunosuppressive treatmentmultidisciplinary approachpharmacoepidemiologypharmaco-utilizationresearch networktransplant

Identifiers

PMID36188626
PMCPMC9521186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.