Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188525›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

No relationship between chronotype and timing of breeding when variation in daily activity patterns across the breeding season is taken into account.

Marjolein Meijdam, Wendt Müller, Bert Thys, Marcel Eens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marjolein MeijdamDepartment of Biology, Behavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group University of Antwerp Wilrijk Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4034-2035
Wendt MüllerDepartment of Biology, Behavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group University of Antwerp Wilrijk Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-4095
Bert ThysDepartment of Biology, Behavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group University of Antwerp Wilrijk Belgium.
Marcel EensDepartment of Biology, Behavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group University of Antwerp Wilrijk Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-3542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that individuals are consistent in the timing of their daily activities, and that individual variation in temporal behavior is related to the timing of reproduction. However, it remains unclear whether observed patterns relate to the timing of the onset of activity or whether an early onset of activity extends the time that is available for foraging. This may then again facilitate reproduction. Furthermore, the timing of activity onset and offset may vary across the breeding season, which may complicate studying the above-mentioned relationships. Here, we examined in a wild population of great tits (

Indexed as

active daylengthchronotypecircadian rhythmclutch initiation dateemergence timeParus major

Identifiers

PMID36188525
PMCPMC9490139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.