Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188481›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Effects of central nervous system electrical stimulation on non-neuronal cells.

Nathaniel P Williams, Neetu Kushwah, Vaishnavi Dhawan, Xin Sally Zheng, Xinyan Tracy Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Beyond graphene: the MXene era in bioprinting.Biomedical engineering online · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathaniel P WilliamsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Neetu KushwahDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Vaishnavi DhawanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Xin Sally ZhengDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Xinyan Tracy CuiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Efficiency and Safety of Microstimulation Via Different Electrode MaterialsR01NS110564 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CUI, XINYAN TRACY · 2019 to 2024
$3.1M
Bioengineering in Psychiatry Training ProgramT32MH119168 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AIZENSTEIN, HOWARD J, IBRAHIM, TAMER S · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
Ultra sensitive and flexible MEAs for chronic dopamine detection at both tonic and phasic levelsR21DA049592 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CUI, XINYAN TRACY · 2019 to 2020
$428k
Laser Induced NanoCarbon Multielectrode Arrays for Neurotransmitter SensingR21NS123937 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BEDEWY, MOSTAFA, CUI, XINYAN TRACY · 2021 to 2021
$423k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA049592NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH119168NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few decades, much progress has been made in the clinical use of electrical stimulation of the central nervous system (CNS) to treat an ever-growing number of conditions from Parkinson's disease (PD) to epilepsy as well as for sensory restoration and many other applications. However, little is known about the effects of microstimulation at the cellular level. Most of the existing research focuses on the effects of electrical stimulation on neurons. Other cells of the CNS such as microglia, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and vascular endothelial cells have been understudied in terms of their response to stimulation. The varied and critical functions of these cell types are now beginning to be better understood, and their vital roles in brain function in both health and disease are becoming better appreciated. To shed light on the importance of the way electrical stimulation as distinct from device implantation impacts non-neuronal cell types, this review will first summarize common stimulation modalities from the perspective of device design and stimulation parameters and how these different parameters have an impact on the physiological response. Following this, what is known about the responses of different cell types to different stimulation modalities will be summarized, drawing on findings from both clinical studies as well as clinically relevant animal models and

Indexed as

astrocytesblood brain barrier (BBB)electrical stimulationendothelial cellsmicroglianeuroinflammationnon-neuronal cell typesoligodendrocytes

Identifiers

PMID36188481
PMCPMC9521315
OpenAlexW4295926196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.