ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Ensemble learning
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- White matter hyperintensity segmentation of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optical spectrum disorders using 2.5D FrC-ResUnet.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the ambiguous boundary of the lesion and inter-observer variability, white matter hyperintensity segmentation annotations are inherently noisy and uncertain. On the other hand, the high capacity of deep neural networks (DNN) enables them to overfit labels with noise and uncertainty, which may lead to biased models with weak generalization ability. This challenge has been addressed by leveraging multiple annotations per image. However, multiple annotations are often not available in a real-world scenario. To mitigate the issue, this paper proposes a supervision augmentation method (SA) and combines it with ensemble learning (SA-EN) to improve the generalization ability of the model. SA can obtain diverse supervision information by estimating the uncertainty of annotation in a real-world scenario that per image have only one ambiguous annotation. Then different base learners in EN are trained with diverse supervision information. The experimental results on two white matter hyperintensity segmentation datasets demonstrate that SA-EN gets the optimal accuracy compared with other state-of-the-art ensemble methods. SA-EN is more effective on small datasets, which is more suitable for medical image segmentation with few annotations. A quantitative study is presented to show the effect of ensemble size and the effectiveness of the ensemble model. Furthermore, SA-EN can capture two types of uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty modeled in SA and epistemic uncertainty modeled in EN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.