Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188477›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Ensemble learning

Xutao Guo, Chenfei Ye, Yanwu Yang, Li Zhang, Li Liang, Shang Lu, Haiyan Lv, Chunjie Guo, Ting Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xutao GuoSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Chenfei YeInternational Research Institute for Artifcial Intelligence, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Yanwu YangSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Li LiangSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Shang LuSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Haiyan LvMindsgo Life Science Company, Shenzhen, China.
Chunjie GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ting MaSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the ambiguous boundary of the lesion and inter-observer variability, white matter hyperintensity segmentation annotations are inherently noisy and uncertain. On the other hand, the high capacity of deep neural networks (DNN) enables them to overfit labels with noise and uncertainty, which may lead to biased models with weak generalization ability. This challenge has been addressed by leveraging multiple annotations per image. However, multiple annotations are often not available in a real-world scenario. To mitigate the issue, this paper proposes a supervision augmentation method (SA) and combines it with ensemble learning (SA-EN) to improve the generalization ability of the model. SA can obtain diverse supervision information by estimating the uncertainty of annotation in a real-world scenario that per image have only one ambiguous annotation. Then different base learners in EN are trained with diverse supervision information. The experimental results on two white matter hyperintensity segmentation datasets demonstrate that SA-EN gets the optimal accuracy compared with other state-of-the-art ensemble methods. SA-EN is more effective on small datasets, which is more suitable for medical image segmentation with few annotations. A quantitative study is presented to show the effect of ensemble size and the effectiveness of the ensemble model. Furthermore, SA-EN can capture two types of uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty modeled in SA and epistemic uncertainty modeled in EN.

Indexed as

deep learningensemble learningsupervision augmentationuncertaintywhite matter hyperintensity segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36188477
PMCPMC9521379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.