ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Using substantial reductant concentration with chelation therapy to enhance small aggregate dispersal, iron mobilization, and its clearance in neurodegenerative diseases.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Iron Overload in Brain: Transport Mismatches, Microbleeding Events, and How Nanochelating Therapies May Counteract Their Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Developing Iron Nanochelating Agents: Preliminary Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety for Central Nervous System Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Connections between altered iron homeostasis and certain neurodegenerative diseases are highlighted by numerous studies suggesting iron neurotoxicity. Iron causes aggregation in neurodegenerative disease-linked proteins as well as others and additionally facilitates oxidative damage. Iron and oxidative damage can cause cell death including by ferroptosis. As treatment for neurodegeneration, chelation therapy alone is sometimes used with modest, varying efficacy and has not in general proven to reverse or halt the damage long term. Questions often focus on optimal chelator partitioning and fine-tuning binding strength; however iron oxidation state chemistry implies a different approach. More specifically, my perspective is that applying a redox-based component to iron mobilization and handling is crucial because ferrous iron is in general a more soluble, weaker biological binder than ferric. Once cellular iron becomes oxidized to ferric, it binds tenaciously, exchanges ligands more slowly, and enhances protein aggregation, which importantly can be reversed by iron reduction. This situation escalates with age as brain reducing ability decreases, iron concentration increases, autophagic clearance decreases, and cell stress diminishes iron handling capacity. Taken together, treatment employing chelation therapy together with a strong biological reductant may effectively remove inappropriately bound cellular iron or at least inhibit accumulation. This approach would likely require high concentration ascorbate or glutathione by IV along with chelation to enhance iron mobilization and elimination, thus reducing cumulative cellular damage and perhaps restoring partial function. Potential treatment-induced oxidative damage may be attenuated by high reductant concentration, appropriate choice of chelator, and/or treatment sequence. Comprehensive study is urged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.