ArticleJournal of blood medicine2022
Comparison of Real-World Dose and Consumption for Two Extended Half-Life Recombinant Factor VIII Products for the Treatment of Hemophilia A in the United States.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost Effectiveness of Efanesoctocog Alfa Versus Factor VIII Extended Half-Life in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Hemophilia A in the USA.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Liposomal factor VIII as an efficient pharmaceutical system for the treatment of hemophilia.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: US patients with hemophilia A can receive prophylaxis with extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products, including efmoroctocog alfa (fragment crystallizable fusion protein) and rurioctocog alfa pegol (antihemophilic factor [recombinant], PEGylated). Objective: To evaluate dosing patterns and weekly consumption of extended half-life rFVIII products in the United States. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the US Specialty Pharmacy Database (2015-2018). Included patients had a diagnosis of hemophilia A, ≥2 consecutive monthly claims for efmoroctocog alfa or rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylaxis, and weight data. Outcome measures included weekly dosing frequency and dispensed weekly dose. Results: The analysis included 774 patients (efmoroctocog alfa, 506; rurioctocog alfa pegol, 268). Mean (SD) age was 24.2 (15.8) and 26.3 (14.9) years for patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa and rurioctocog alfa pegol, respectively; mean (SD) weight was 68.4 (36.8) and 79.8 (37.7) kg, respectively. The most frequent efmoroctocog alfa regimen was twice weekly (45.7%), followed by every 4 days (20.6%), every 3 days (9.1%), and 3 times per week (7.5%). The most frequent rurioctocog alfa pegol regimen was twice weekly (72.4%), followed by 3 times per week (8.7%), every 4 days (7.6%), and every 3 days (5.5%). The proportion of efmoroctocog alfa twice-weekly dispensing records increased from 31.5% to 50.9%, and every 4 days dispensing records decreased from 31.3% to 14.5% (2015-2018). The proportion of rurioctocog alfa pegol dispensing records remained broadly stable (2016-2018). Overall, mean (SD; median) weekly prophylactic dose was 105.4 (77.9; 92.6) IU/kg with efmoroctocog alfa, and 96.8 (41.9; 90.9) IU/kg with rurioctocog alfa pegol. Conclusion: In this database study, the most frequently observed dosing frequency was twice weekly for patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa or rurioctocog alfa pegol. The observed mean weekly consumption was slightly higher, and variation was greater, in patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa versus rurioctocog alfa pegol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.