Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188436›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Single and Multifraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and the Risk of Radiation Induced Myelopathy.

J John Lucido, Trey C Mullikin, Feven Abraha, W Scott Harmsen, Birjoo D Vaishnav, Debra H Brinkmann, Roman O Kowalchuk, Joseph T Marion, Benjamin A Johnson-Tesch, Omar El Sherif and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomedical advances and future prospects of high-precision three-dimensional radiotherapy and four-dimensional radiotherapy.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

J John LucidoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Trey C MullikinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Feven AbrahaDepartment of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
W Scott HarmsenDepartment of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Birjoo D VaishnavWeisger Cancer Institute, Novant Health Presbyterian Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Debra H BrinkmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Roman O KowalchukDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Joseph T MarionDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Benjamin A Johnson-TeschDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Omar El SherifDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Peter S RoseDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dawn OwenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jonathan M MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mark R WaddleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Brittany L SiontisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Bradley J StishDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Deanna H PafundiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Nadia N LaackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kenneth R OlivierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sean S ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kenneth W MerrellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study reports on the risk of radiation-induced myelitis (RM) of the spinal cord from a large single-institutional experience with 1 to 5 fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the spine. Methods and Materials: A retrospective review of patients who received spine SBRT to a radiation naïve level at or above the conus medullaris between 2007 and 2019 was performed. Local failure determination was based on SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RM was defined as neurologic symptoms consistent with the segment of cord irradiated in the absence of neoplastic disease recurrence and graded by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Rates of adverse events were estimated and dose-volume statistics from delivered treatment plans were extracted for the planning target volumes and spinal cord. Results: A total of 353 lesions in 277 patients were identified that met the specified criteria, for which 270, 70, and 13 lesions received 1-, 3-, and 5-fraction treatments, respectively, with a median follow-up of 46 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-52 months) for all surviving patients. The median overall survival was 33.0 months (95% CI, 29-43). The median D0.03cc to the spinal cord was 11.7 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 10.5-12.4), 16.7 Gy (IQR, 12.8-20.6), and 26.0 Gy (IQR, 24.1-28.1), for 1-, 3-, 5-fractions. Using an a/b = 2Gy for the spinal cord, the median single-fraction equivalent-dose (SFED Conclusions: Spine SBRT is safe while limiting the spinal cord (as defined on treatment planning magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography myelogram) D0.03cc to less than 14 Gy, 21.9 Gy, and 30 Gy, for 1, 3, and 5-fractions, consistent with standard guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID36188436
PMCPMC9515434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.