ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2022
Providers' approaches to contraceptive provision in Cape Town.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of different progestins in combined oral contraceptives: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Provider perspectives on adolescent access to contraception in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health care providers can play a significant role in empowering women to make informed decisions when selecting suitable contraceptive methods during contraceptive counseling. This study explores primary care providers' perspectives and approaches to contraceptive service provision for women attending public sector clinics in South Africa, with the intention of ascertaining established practices and training needs. Methods: Ten in-depth interviews were conducted at five primary health care facilities in urban areas in Cape Town, South Africa. Eligible participants included nurses providing contraceptive services and willing to participate in the study. The qualitative software package NVivo was used to sort and manage data. Data was analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: Overall, providers emphasized supporting women in contraceptive decision-making. Sexual and reproductive health training increased providers confidence to deliver appropriate contraceptive services. Contraceptive prescribing practices were influenced by women's medical history and preferred bleeding patterns. Providers' concerns about adherence to methods for younger women and suspected adverse events for older women impacted on prescribing. Challenges experienced when providing contraceptive services included: contraceptive stockouts; time constraints of employed women accessing the service; and their work pressure due to providing other health services. Discussion: Health care providers play a critical role in facilitating women's right to access high quality contraceptive services. Providers saw themselves as negotiators during contraceptive counseling. They considered both women's preferences and their own recommendations for contraception, to provide information that would enable women to make informed contraceptive decisions. By reinforcing this approach to contraceptive counseling and focusing on shared decision-making, should encourage autonomy in method selection and limit the influence of provider's contraceptive method selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.