Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188363›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

The sensitivity and specificity of the modified volume-viscosity swallow test for dysphagia screening among neurological patients.

Yiqiu Lin, Guifang Wan, Huixiang Wu, Jing Shi, Yaowen Zhang, Huayu Chen, Xiaomei Wei, Zhiming Tang, Meng Dai, Zulin Dou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Volume-viscosity swallow test to facilitate individualized dietary modifications for dysphagia following intracerebral hemorrhage.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yiqiu LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guifang WanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Huixiang WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing ShiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yaowen ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Huayu ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaomei WeiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiming TangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Meng DaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zulin DouDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongmei WenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a highly prevalent condition after stroke and other neurological diseases. The volume-viscosity swallow test (V-VST) is a screening tool for OD. Considering that the recommendations of volume and thickeners in the original V-VST limited the popularization and application of the test in the Chinese population, we provide the modified V-VST to detect OD among neurological patients. In addition, the accuracy of the modified V-VST to screen OD needs to be verified. We included 101 patients with neurological diseases. OD was evaluated by a modified V-VST and a videofluoroscopy swallowing study (VFSS) using 3 volumes (i.e., 3, 5, and 10 ml) and 4 viscosities (i.e., water, mildly thick, moderately thick, and extremely thick). In this study, to compare with the original V-VST results, a volume of 20 ml was also included. The discriminating ability of modified V-VST in detecting OD was assessed by the sensitivity and specificity values of clinical signs of impaired efficiency (impaired labial seal, piecemeal deglutition, and residue) and impaired safety of swallowing (cough, voice changes, and oxygen desaturation ≥3%) in comparison to the results of VFSS. The modified V-VST showed 96.6% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity for OD, 85.2% sensitivity and 70% specificity for impaired safety, and 90.9% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity for impaired efficacy. Our study suggests that the modified V-VST offers a high discriminating ability in detecting OD among neurological patients.

Indexed as

dysphagiamodified volume-viscosity swallow testneurological diseasesscreeningsensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID36188363
PMCPMC9523084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.