Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187917›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

Angiogenesis goes computational - The future way forward to discover new angiogenic targets?

Abhishek Subramanian, Pooya Zakeri, Mira Mousa, Halima Alnaqbi, Fatima Yousif Alshamsi, Leo Bettoni, Ernesto Damiani, Habiba Alsafar, Yvan Saeys, Peter Carmeliet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abhishek SubramanianLaboratory of Angiogenesis & Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
Pooya ZakeriLaboratory of Angiogenesis & Vascular Heterogeneity, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mira MousaCenter for Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Halima AlnaqbiCenter for Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Fatima Yousif AlshamsiCenter for Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Leo BettoniLaboratory of Angiogenesis & Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
Ernesto DamianiRobotics and Intelligent Systems Institute, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Habiba AlsafarCenter for Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Yvan SaeysData Mining and Modelling for Biomedicine Group, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter CarmelietLaboratory of Angiogenesis & Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-omics technologies are being increasingly utilized in angiogenesis research. Yet, computational methods have not been widely used for angiogenic target discovery and prioritization in this field, partly because (wet-lab) vascular biologists are insufficiently familiar with computational biology tools and the opportunities they may offer. With this review, written for vascular biologists who lack expertise in computational methods, we aspire to break boundaries between both fields and to illustrate the potential of these tools for future angiogenic target discovery. We provide a comprehensive survey of currently available computational approaches that may be useful in prioritizing candidate genes, predicting associated mechanisms, and identifying their specificity to endothelial cell subtypes. We specifically highlight tools that use flexible, machine learning frameworks for large-scale data integration and gene prioritization. For each purpose-oriented category of tools, we describe underlying conceptual principles, highlight interesting applications and discuss limitations. Finally, we will discuss challenges and recommend some guidelines which can help to optimize the process of accurate target discovery.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisBiological networksFunctional enrichmentGene prioritizationSingle-cell multi-omicsUnsupervised and supervised data fusion

Identifiers

PMID36187917
PMCPMC9508490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.