Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187851›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy on

Revathy M Nair, S Jayasree, E Sruthi Poornima, M Ashique

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial efficacy of modified gutta-percha for obturation - A systematic review.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effectiveness of three auxiliary irrigation methods for cleaning the internal walls of root canals of curved isolated teeth.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2023
    Article
  12. Efficacy of Endodontic Disinfection Protocols in anJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Revathy M NairDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
S JayasreeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
E Sruthi PoornimaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
M AshiqueDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various irrigation techniques have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of root canal debridement. Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the antimicrobial effect on Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted permanent maxillary molars with curved mesiobuccal roots were inoculated with Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Intergroup comparison was made with Mann-Whitney Results: Although statistically insignificant, the irrigation techniques have shown considerable reduction in Conclusion: The newer PIPS technology can be used as an efficient tool in the decontamination of root canals. However, more clinical studies in this aspect are required to ensure more thorough debridement and disinfection of the root canal system.

Indexed as

EndoVacEnterococcus faecalislaser irrigation with photon-induced photoacoustic streamingpassive ultrasonic irrigationphotodynamic therapyscanning electron microscope

Identifiers

PMID36187851
PMCPMC9520643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.