Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187746›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Does quality of novice hand-tied square knots improve with repetition during a single training session?

Karen Tobias, Pierre-Yves Mulon, Alec Daniels, Xiaocun Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen TobiasSmall Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
Pierre-Yves MulonDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
Alec DanielsSmall Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
Xiaocun SunOffice of Information Technology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knot tying is a key surgical skill for novices, and repetition over several training sessions improves knot tying. This study examined the effects of repetition within a single training session on quality of knotted loops and compared results of novice trainees and experienced surgeons. Methods: Using 0.55 mm nylon monofilament fishing line, novices and surgeons each hand-tied 20 knotted loops, using a 2=1=1=1 configuration (surgeon's throw and three square throws). Loops were mechanically tested with a single load to failure. Results: All loops tolerated five newtons (N) preload. More than 70% of novice and surgeon knots failed by slipping or untying, and 8.8% of novice knots and 2.5% of surgeon's knots were considered dangerous. Surgeons' loops had less extension at preload, indicating better loop security. However, during single test to failure, there was no difference in mean extension or maximum load between surgeons and novices. There was no significant difference in results of mechanical testing or modes of failure for the first and last ten knotted loops, or the first, second, third, and fourth sets of knotted loops. Discussion: With appropriate training, novices can construct knots as strong and secure as experienced surgeons. A large percentage of knotted loops are insecure under testing conditions; extra throws may be required when using large diameter monofilament nylon. Novices may require extra training in maintenance of loop security when constructing square knots. Tying more than five or 10 knotted loops within a single training session does not provide added benefits for novices.

Indexed as

NylonsSurgeonsHumansSuturesSuture TechniquesTensile StrengthNylonsKnot failureKnot securityKnot tyingMechanical testingMode of failureRepetitionSquare knotSurgical learningSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID36187746
PMCPMC9521345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.