Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187721›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening strategies for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) among women living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Helen Kelly, Iman Jaafar, Michael Chung, Pamela Michelow, Sharon Greene, Howard Strickler, Xianhong Xie, Mark Schiffman, Nathalie Broutet, Philippe Mayaud and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment Algorithms Using Human Papillomavirus Testing-Lessons Learnt from a South African Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Triage of HPV positivity in a high HIV prevalence setting: A prospective cohort study comparing visual triage methods and HPV genotype restriction in Botswana.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2024
    Trial
  3. Real-World Performance of HPV DNA-Based Screening in Health Resource-Limited Areas of China: A Multicenter Implementation Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Improved cervical screening using HPV type restriction and cycle threshold limit setting with the AmpFire assay: A prospective screening cohort of women with and without HIV in Botswana.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Helen KellyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Iman JaafarUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Michael ChungDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Pamela MichelowCytology Unit, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Health Science, National Health Laboratory Service, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sharon GreeneDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Howard StricklerAlbert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Xianhong XieAlbert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Mark SchiffmanNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Nathalie BroutetDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philippe MayaudLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Shona DalalDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marc ArbynUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Silvia de SanjoséNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Washington · USWorld Health Organization · CHGhent University · BELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Health Laboratory Service · ZASciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Sex differences in the role of multi-omics in HIV-associated carotid artery atherosclerosisU01HL146204 · NHLBI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI David B. Hanna, Anjali Sharma · 2019 to 2026
$33.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL146204World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We systematically reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening and triage strategies in women living with HIV (WLHIV). Methods: Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health and Medline were searched for randomised controlled trials, prospective or cross-sectional studies published from database inception to 15 July 2022 reporting diagnostic accuracy of tests in cervical cancer screening and triage of screen-positive WLHIV. Studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of any cervical cancer screening or triage strategies for the detection of histologically-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) among WLHIV. Summary data were extracted from published reports. Authors were contacted for missing data where applicable. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for CIN2/3+ were pooled using models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. PROSPERO registration:CRD42020189031. Findings: In 38 studies among 18,737 WLHIV, the majority (n=19) were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. The pooled prevalence was 12.0% (95%CI:9.8-14.1) for CIN2+ and 6.7% (95%CI:5.0-8.4) for CIN3+. The proportion of screen-positive ranged from 3-31% (visual inspection using acetic acid[VIA]); 2-46% (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and greater [HSIL+] cytology); 20-64% (high-risk[HR]-HPV DNA). In 14 studies, sensitivity and specificity of VIA were variable limiting the reliability of pooled estimates. In 5 studies where majority had histology-confirmed CIN2+, pooled sensitivity was 56.0% (95%CI:45.4-66.1; Interpretation: HPV-DNA based approaches consistently showed superior sensitivity for CIN2+/CIN3+ compared to VIA or cytology. The low specificity of HPV-DNA based methods targeting up to 14-HR-HPV could be improved significantly by restricting to 8-HR-HPV with only minor losses in sensitivity, limiting requirement for triage for which optimal approaches are less clear. Funding: World Health Organisation; National Cancer Institute; European Union's Horizon 2020 and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCytologyDiagnostic accuracyHIVHR-HPVScreeningVisual inspection

Identifiers

PMID36187721
PMCPMC9520209
OpenAlexW4297368412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.