Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187710›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2022

Daily and weekly external loads in the microcycle: Characterization and comparison between playing positions on amateur soccer.

Mauro Miguel, Alberto Cortez, Felix Romero, Nuno Loureiro, Javier García-Rubio, Sergio José Ibáñez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mauro MiguelTraining Optimization and Sports Performance Research Group (GOERD), Sport Science Faculty, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Alberto CortezCoimbra Business School, Institute of Accounting and Administration of Coimbra (ISCAC), Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Felix RomeroSport Sciences School of Rio Maior, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Santarém, Portugal.
Nuno LoureiroSport Sciences School of Rio Maior, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Santarém, Portugal.
Javier García-RubioTraining Optimization and Sports Performance Research Group (GOERD), Sport Science Faculty, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Sergio José IbáñezTraining Optimization and Sports Performance Research Group (GOERD), Sport Science Faculty, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring adequate levels of training and recovery to maximize player performance is critical; however, there are methodological challenges in designing a periodized training program for soccer teams. This study aims to describe and characterize the daily and weekly external load in an amateur soccer team and based on the weighting factors determined by the match reference, compare the external loads between playing positions. Twenty-four amateur soccer players (22.3 ± 1.7 years) were monitored using a global positioning system. Data collected comprises 19 competitive microcycles with a standard structure composed of 3 training sessions (matchday-5, matchday-3, and matchday-2) and one match. Match-reference values were calculated as the mean of the five best values recorded during official matches. The results show, on matchday-5 session, the existence of significant differences between playing positions to relative total distance covered (

Indexed as

daily loadexternal loadmatch referenceplaying positionssoccerweekly load

Identifiers

PMID36187710
PMCPMC9521678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.