ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Inequalities in access to community-based diabetes examination and its impact on healthcare utilization among middle-aged and older adults with diabetes in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare access among patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Social determinants of health and type 2 diabetes in Asia.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Review
- Social welfare and economic equality: healthcare expenditure as a moderator.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Exploring unmet healthcare needs and associated inequalities among middle-aged and older adults in Eastern China during the progression toward universal health coverage.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, diabetes and its complications are becoming one of the leading challenges in health governance. As health inequalities and primary care services related to diabetes are gaining traction, the status of community-based diabetes examination largely remains unclear in the literature. This study aims to investigate inequalities in access to community-based diabetes examination among people with diabetes and to analyze its impact on healthcare utilization. Data from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were applied, and a total of 767 patients with diabetes were included. Inequalities in community-based diabetes examination were illustrated by the concentration curve and normalized concentration index. Propensity score matching (PSM) were used to identify the impact of community-based diabetes examination on outpatient and inpatient care utilization. We found that community-based diabetes examination was accessible to 23.08% of the respondents, of which 76.84% were free, and the highest frequency was 2-6 times per year, accounting for 47.46%. Community-based diabetes examinations were more concentrated among people with poorer-economic condition (95% confidence interval, 95%CI = -0.104,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.