Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187665›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Psychological determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among urban slum dwellers of Bangladesh.

Muhammad Mainuddin Patwary, Mondira Bardhan, Sardar Al Imran, Mehedi Hasan, Faiza Imam Tuhi, Sama Jamila Rahim, Md Navid Newaz, Mahadi Hasan, Md Zahidul Haque, Asma Safia Disha and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Muhammad Mainuddin PatwaryEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Mondira BardhanEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Sardar Al ImranEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Mehedi HasanEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Faiza Imam TuhiEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Sama Jamila RahimEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Md Navid NewazEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Mahadi HasanEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Md Zahidul HaqueEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Asma Safia DishaEnvironment and Sustainability Research Initiative, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Md Riad HossainInstitute of Disaster Management, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesGrupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundacion Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Colombia.
Fahimeh SaeedPsychosis Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sardar Khan NazariSakha Private Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Sheikh ShoibDepartment of Psychiatry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Hospital (JLNMH), Srinagar, India.
Khulna University · BDUniversity of Dhaka · BDKamla Nehru Memorial Hospital · INKhulna University of Engineering and Technology · BDUniversidad Privada Franz Tamayo · BOUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has emerged as a promising approach to counter the harmful impacts of the pandemic. Understanding the psychological components that may impact an individual's attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination is crucial for generating evidence-based ways to minimize vaccine hesitancy. This study determined the psychological antecedents regarding vaccine acceptance among urban slum people of Bangladesh. Methods: From 5 July to 5 August 5, 2021, a face-to-face survey was conducted in the urban slum of two large cities in Bangladesh. The questionnaire considered socio-demographics, health-related characteristics, psychological determinants, sources of information, and conspiracy beliefs regarding COVID-19. The 5C sub-scales were used to assess psychological antecedents. Five stepwise binary logistic regression models evaluated significant predictors for confidence, complacency, calculation, constraints, and collective responsibility. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between psychological antecedents and vaccine acceptability. Results: The study revealed that the slum residents with a high level of confident (89.94%), complacent (72.73%), having constraints (82.31%), calculative (84.80%), and responsible (93.30%) showed a higher vaccine acceptance rate. Higher vaccine acceptance was related to the believer in natural-made origin (85.96%) and those who rejected anti-vaccination (88.44%). The information acquired from newspapers differed significantly ( Conclusions: Different predictors significantly affect psychological antecedents related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Therefore, considering the factors, targeted actions based on the findings may help to lower vaccine reluctance and boost vaccination rates.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesBangladeshCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePoverty AreasCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines5C sub-scalesBangladeshCOVID-19psychological antecedentsslum peoplevaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36187665
PMCPMC9523437
OpenAlexW4296046943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.