Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187663›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Syphilis response policies and their assessments: A scoping review.

Milena C D Almeida, António M R Cordeiro, Aliete Cunha-Oliveira, Daniele M S Barros, Diana G S M Santos, Thaísa S Lima, Ricardo A M Valentim

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Milena C D AlmeidaCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
António M R CordeiroCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Aliete Cunha-OliveiraCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Daniele M S BarrosLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Diana G S M SantosHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), School of Nursing of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Thaísa S LimaLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Ricardo A M ValentimLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
University of Coimbra · PTUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BREscola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra · PTMinistério da Saúde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syphilis is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) worldwide and has shown a rising trend in recent years, according to a report published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2021. Given this problem, the present study aims to develop a scoping review of what has been done in the world after the publication of the global strategy for the elimination of STIs, with a specific focus on syphilis. Thus, we searched for papers on health policies in response to syphilis in Pubmed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO by CINAHL, as well as in official documents from international health organizations. The period from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2022 was considered. Our search returned 880 papers addressing "Syphilis," "Health Policy," and "Health Policies" combined. Twenty-three papers fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria according to two research questions set out for this scoping review. Our findings suggest that Brazil and Peru presented the greatest adequacy of the strategies provided by WHO in 2016 and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) in 2017, aiming tothe goals set out in the UN's 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Among the studies found, six countries (Cuba, Thailand, Belarus, Armenia, Moldova, and Puerto Rico) reported the elimination of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of syphilis, but the most recent data are from 2016. Furthermore, it is essential to mention that no country has been found that has presented a comprehensive response to syphilis, noting the control or elimination of the disease in all key populations. Thus, it is necessary to constantly monitor national policies based on in-depth studies on the quality of the response, the challenges, and the national, regional, and global perspectives for the control of the disease until 2030, the year in which the SDGs will be reviewed. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/x9er5/?view_only=0cc0062222ec45dcb2f4d41484d285b6, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X9ER5.

Indexed as

Sexually Transmitted DiseasesSyphilisFemaleHealth PolicyHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalWorld Health Organizationevaluationhealthcare policyhealth policypublic health policysyphilis

Identifiers

PMID36187663
PMCPMC9523564
OpenAlexW4296056504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.