Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187596›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2022

Industry 5.0 in Orthopaedics.

Madhan Jeyaraman, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Naveen Jeyaraman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Sensor Technology in Fracture Healing.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Madhan Jeyaraman *Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-9493
Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy *Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751019 India.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-2883
Naveen JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Atlas Hospitals, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu 620002 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4362-3326
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INDr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute · INNational Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Industrial revolutions play a major role in the development of technologies in various fields. Currently, the world is marching towards softwarization and digitalization. There is an emerging need for conversion of Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 for technological development and implementation of the same in the digital era. In health care, digitalization emerged in Industry 4.0 revolution. To enhance patient care and quality of life, Industry 5.0 plays a major role in providing patient-centric care and customization and personalization of products. The integration of human intelligence with artificial intelligence provides a precise diagnosis and enhances the recovery and functional outcome of the patients. Materials and methods: In this manuscript, the domains and limitations of Industry 5.0 and further research on Industry 6.0 were elaborated on to bring out technologies in better health care. Results: Industry 5.0 lessens the work of medical professionals and integrates software-based diagnosis and management. It provides cost-effective manufacturing solutions with limited resources compared to Industry 4.0. Industry 5.0 focuses on SMART and additive manufacturing of implants, and the development of bio-scaffolds, prosthetics, and instruments. In this manuscript, the domains and limitations of Industry 5.0 and further research on Industry 6.0 were elaborated on to bring out technologies in better health care. Conclusion: 'The personalization and customization of products' are the hallmarks of this evolving Industry 5.0 revolution. The major uplifts in various domains of industry 5.0 such as advanced automation, digitalization, collaborative robots, and personalization bring this an inevitable mechano-scientific technological revolution in this current medical era.

Indexed as

Bio-scaffoldsCustomizationDigitalizationIndustry 5.0Personalization

Identifiers

PMID36187596
PMCPMC9485301
OpenAlexW4292787513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.