ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022
Testing technology for tensile properties of metal materials based on deep learning model.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The properties of metallic materials have been extensively studied, and nowadays the tensile properties testing techniques of metallic materials still have not found a suitable research method. In this paper, the neural Turing machine model is first applied to explore the tensile properties of metallic materials and its usability is demonstrated. Then the neural Turing machine model was improved. The model is then improved so that the required results can be obtained faster and more explicitly. Based on the improved Neural Turing Machine model in the exploration of tensile properties of metal materials, it was found that both H-NTM and AH-NTM have less training time than NTM. A-NTM takes more training time than AH-NTM. The improvement reduces the training time of the model. In replication, addition, and multiplication, the training time is reduced by 6.0, 8.8, and 7.3%, respectively. When the indentation interval is 0.5-0.7 mm, the error of the initial indentation data is large. The error of the tensile properties of the material obtained after removing the data at this time is significantly reduced. When the indentation interval is 0.8-1.5 mm, the stress is closer to the real value of tensile test yield strength 219.9 Mpa and tensile test tensile strength 258.8 Mpa. this paper will improve the neural Turing machine model in the exploration of metal material tensile properties testing technology has some application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.