Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187522›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2022

When to Avoid a Restaging Procedure for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer? Inferences from a Tertiary Care Center.

Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Ankur Mittal, Sunil Kumar, Tushar Aditya Narain, Sanjeev Kishore, Shiv Charan Navriya, Satish Kumar Ranjan, Vikas Kumar Panwar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak Prakash BhirudDepartment of Urology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India 249203.
Ankur MittalDepartment of Urology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India 249203.
Sunil KumarDepartment of Urology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India 249203.
Tushar Aditya NarainDepartment of Urology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India 249203.
Sanjeev KishoreDepartment of Pathology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India.
Shiv Charan NavriyaDepartment of Urology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India 249203.
Satish Kumar RanjanDepartment of Urology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India 249203.
Vikas Kumar PanwarDepartment of Urology, AiimsRishikesh, Uttarakhand India 249203.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · INSeema Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing incidence of urinary bladder carcinoma is alarming. Approximately seventy percent of these patients are non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the current recommendation for any T1 and or high-grade non muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC) to accurately stage the malignancy. The question whether a second surgery is always required as a restage procedure is still unanswered. The patient's concern about completeness, morbidity, and financial considerations of a major surgery cannot be overlooked. Moreover, it also puts a strain on the already overburdened healthcare system. To answer this question, whether it is oncologically sound to omit a second resection, the current study evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing restage TURBT, and analyzed the preoperative factors predicting a change in the staging of this malignancy. The study design was a prospective observational including NMIBC patients from September 2018 to February 2020. A total of 72 patients underwent restage TURBT. Their demographic data, imaging and cystoscopic findings, and histopathological data were recorded. The objective was to study the clinico-pathological correlations and factors predicting recurrence and upstaging of tumor in NMIBC patients undergoing restage TURBT. A total of 101 patients were found eligible for restage TURBT. Eventually, 72 underwent restage TURBT. Twelve (16.7%) patient had recurrence at restage while 3(4.16%) were upstaged to T2. Presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) was independently associated with the risk of recurrence of same stage compared to no recurrence ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-022-01516-8.

Indexed as

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)Restage TURBTUrothelial bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID36187522
PMCPMC9515286
OpenAlexW4220685413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.