Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187514›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2022

Clinical Profile and Survival Outcome of Endometrial Cancer with p53 Mutation.

Anila Tresa, Suchetha Sambasivan, P Rema, Dhanya Dinesh, J Sivaranjith, Sindhu P Nair, Aleyamma Mathew, J V Ammu, Aswin Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of TP53 somatic mutations on prognosis in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Molecular subtypes and survival patterns of endometrial cancer in a South Indian cohort.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic implications of immunohistochemistry in patients with endometrial cancer.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anila TresaDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-7741
Suchetha SambasivanDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0001-8128-0363
P RemaDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0002-4550-2632
Dhanya DineshDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0003-3548-7544
J SivaranjithDivision of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0002-5113-1946
Sindhu P NairDepartment of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.
Aleyamma MathewDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0002-1574-7356
J V AmmuDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-0494
Aswin KumarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India.ORCID 0000-0002-8794-1975
Regional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicopathologic classification of endometrial cancer imperfectly reflects the tumor biology. Pathologic categorization - especially in high-grade tumors - results in an imprecise estimation of the risk of disease, recurrence, and death. Molecular subtyping is emerging as the standard of care in diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancers. Molecular markers are important prognostic factors in tumor dissemination and early recurrence of endometrial cancers. TP53 mutation is an important prognostic factor for both serous and endometrioid cancers. The study aims to compare the clinical profile and overall survival of endometrial cancers with and without p53 mutation. Sixty-three patients who underwent surgical staging for carcinoma endometrium were included in the study.TP53 mutation status was determined based on p53 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a p53 wild or p53 mutant type. Data were analyzed for the clinical profile, p53 mutation status on IHC, histological pattern, tumor grade, stage of the disease, lymph node spread, recurrence pattern, treatment received, 2-year disease-free survival, and overall survival. Recurrence was noted in 12.7% patients after 2-year follow-up, of which 75% patients had p53 mutation. Significant association was seen between p53 expression and high-grade tumors, stage, cervical involvement, and adnexal involvement. The 2-year overall survival of the p53 wild type was 97.2% and the p53 mutant type was 91.7%. The 2-year disease-free survival for the p53 wild type was 94.3% and the disease-free survival of the p53 mutant variety was 83.5%. The 2-year disease-free survival for endometrioid carcinoma with p53 wild type was 100% and p53 mutant variety was 86.2% (

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerp53 mutationSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36187514
PMCPMC9515295
OpenAlexW4214825811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.