Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187450›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Diagnosing gangrenous cholecystitis on computed tomography using deep learning: A preliminary study.

Yoichi Okuda, Tsukasa Saida, Keigo Morinaga, Arisa Ohara, Akihiro Hara, Shinji Hashimoto, Shinji Takahashi, Tomoaki Goya, Nobuhiro Ohkohchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative performance among inflammatory biomarkers for pre-operative prediction of gangrenous cholecystitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoichi OkudaDepertment of Surgery Koyama Memorial Hospital Kashima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-0494
Tsukasa SaidaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-7375
Keigo MorinagaDepartment of Radiology Koyama Memorial Hospital Kashima Japan.
Arisa OharaDepartment of Radiology Koyama Memorial Hospital Kashima Japan.
Akihiro HaraDepertment of Surgery Koyama Memorial Hospital Kashima Japan.
Shinji HashimotoDepertment of Surgery Koyama Memorial Hospital Kashima Japan.
Shinji TakahashiDepertment of Surgery Koyama Memorial Hospital Kashima Japan.
Tomoaki GoyaDepertment of Surgery Koyama Memorial Hospital Kashima Japan.
Nobuhiro OhkohchiDepartment of Surgery Mitochuo Hospital Mito Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To compare deep learning and experienced physicians in diagnosing gangrenous cholecystitis using computed tomography images and explore the feasibility of diagnostic assistance for acute cholecystitis requiring emergency surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 25 patients with pathologically confirmed gangrenous cholecystitis and 129 patients with noncomplicated acute cholecystitis who underwent computed tomography between 2016 and 2021 at two institutions. All available computed tomography images at the time of the initial diagnosis were used for the analysis. A deep learning model based on a convolutional neural network was trained using 1,517 images of 112 patients (18 patients with gangrenous cholecystitis and 94 patients with acute cholecystitis) and tested with 68 images of 42 patients (seven patients with gangrenous cholecystitis and 35 patients with acute cholecystitis). Three blinded, experienced physicians independently interpreted the test images. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were compared between the convolutional neural network and the reviewers. Results: The convolutional neural network (sensitivity, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.87, specificity, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96, accuracy, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.00) had achieved a better diagnostic performance than the reviewers (ex. sensitivity, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-0.77, specificity, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71, accuracy, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.57-0.72, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82; Conclusions: Deep learning had a better diagnostic performance than experienced reviewers in diagnosing gangrenous cholecystitis and has potential applicability for assisting in identifying indications for emergency surgery in the future.

Indexed as

Acute cholecystitisartificial intelligencecomputed tomographyconvolutional neural network

Identifiers

PMID36187450
PMCPMC9487185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.