Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187449›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social restrictions on ambulance calls for suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm: a population-based study in Osaka prefecture, Japan.

Shunichiro Nakao, Yusuke Katayama, Kenta Tanaka, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Tomoya Hirose, Jotaro Tachino, Taku Iwami, Takeshi Shimazu, Jun Oda, Tetsuya Matsuoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shunichiro NakaoDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-806X
Yusuke KatayamaDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-4259
Kenta TanakaDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-0580
Tomoya HiroseDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-4569
Jotaro TachinoDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-7713
Taku IwamiDepartment of Preventive Services, School of Public Health Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Takeshi ShimazuOsaka General Medical Center Osaka Japan.
Jun OdaDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.
Tetsuya MatsuokaRinku General Medical Center Osaka Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Self-harm is a common ambulance call and is potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm increased in 2020. Methods: We undertook a population-based observational study using a database from the Osaka prefectural government. Ambulance transport of patients due to self-harm from 2016 through 2020 was investigated. We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios using a Poisson regression model to compare the annual incidence rates of ambulance transport in 2017-2020 with those in 2016. We also provided age-stratified analysis. Results: We analyzed 13,648 patients. There was no difference in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 compared with 2016. In the age group of 20-29 years, despite no difference in 2017-2019 compared with 2016, we found a 13.8% increase in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm in 2020 (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.138; 95% confidence interval, 1.025-1.265). Conclusions: Although there was no difference in the incidence of ambulance transport due to self-harm in 2017-2019, that in 2020 increased in the age group of 20-29 years.

Indexed as

Ambulance transportCOVID‐19 pandemicmental healthpopulation‐based researchself‐harm

Identifiers

PMID36187449
PMCPMC9500421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.