ArticleResuscitation plus2022
Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation · 2025Guideline
- Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a trial-based Markov model with a lifetime horizon.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2026Trial
- Establishing an Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Program.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- A review of the clinical value of mechanical ventilators and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) equipment.IPEM-translation · 2024Review
- A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of treating out of hospital cardiac arrest and the implications for resource-limited health systems.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Implications for Resource-limited Health Systems.Research square · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is a method of CPR that passes the patient's blood through an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to provide mechanical haemodynamic and oxygenation support in cardiac arrest patients who are not responsive to conventional CPR (C-CPR). E-CPR is being adopted rapidly worldwide despite the absence of high quality trial data and its substantial cost. Published cost-effectiveness data for E-CPR are scarce. Methods: We developed a mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of E-CPR relative to C-CPR in adult patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The model was a combination of a decision tree for the acute treatment phase and a Markov model for long-term periods. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the Australian health system perspective over lifetime. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as Australian dollars (AUD, 2021 value) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Variables were parameterised using published data. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of E-CPR was estimated to be AUD 45,716 per QALY gained over lifetime (95% uncertainty range 22,102-292,904). The cost-effectiveness of E-CPR was most sensitive to the outcome of the therapy. Conclusion: E-CPR has median ICER that is below common accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Local factors within the health care system need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing an effective E-CPR program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.