ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2022
Practical and Ethical Considerations in Telehealth: Pitfalls and Opportunities.
Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Health Literacy and Attitudes Toward Telehealth Use in Practice Among Nursing Students in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Neurological Examination via Telemedicine: An Updated Review Focusing on Movement Disorders.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Proposal and Rationale for a Cardioethics Curriculum.JACC. Advances · 2024Review
- Ethical considerations in telehealth and artificial intelligence for work related musculoskeletal disorders: A scoping review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Exploring User Perspectives of and Ethical Experiences With Teletherapy Apps: Qualitative Analysis of User Reviews.JMIR mental health · 2023Article
- A cancer care desert: living in between the urban and rural and the case for defining semirural regions.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Ethical acceptability of telemedicine: Nursing home resident's perspective on telemedical consultations.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telehealth has been a long-awaited advancement with the potential to improve efficiency, convenience, and quality in healthcare. However, as telehealth becomes integrated into routine clinical care, it is imperative to consider the practical and ethical implications that could undermine or devalue care delivery. The medical profession must ensure that it is implemented judiciously and with robust quality standards, guided by fair and equitable policies that balance patient autonomy with rigorous standards of care and access. Such a system must recognize the opportunity for more patient input as stakeholders to tailor care to their needs and preferences, while also acknowledging the risk of suboptimal care if convenience is prioritized over quality. More studies of optimal care models are needed to integrate data in terms of both stakeholder input and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36187411PMC9511944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.