Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2022

Ultrasonication effects on graphene composites in neural cell cultures.

Łucja Dybowska-Sarapuk, Weronika Sosnowicz, Anna Grzeczkowicz, Jakub Krzemiński, Małgorzata Jakubowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Łucja Dybowska-SarapukFaculty of Mechatronics, The Institute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Weronika SosnowiczFaculty of Mechatronics, The Institute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna GrzeczkowiczNalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub KrzemińskiCentre for Advanced Materials and Technologies CEZAMAT, Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata JakubowskaFaculty of Mechatronics, The Institute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injuries and neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and traumatic brain injuries, remain challenging to treat. Nowadays, neural stem cell therapies excite high expectations within academia. The increasing demand for innovative solutions in regenerative medicine has drawn considerable attention to graphene materials. Due to unique properties, carbon materials are increasingly used as cellular scaffolds. They provide a biological microenvironment supporting cell adhesion and proliferation. The topography and mechanical properties of the graphene culture surface influence the forces exerted by the cells on their extracellular matrix. Which consequently affects the cell proliferation and differentiation. As a result, material properties such as stiffness, elasticity and mechanical strength play an important role in stem cells' growth and life. The ink unification process is crucial while the layer homogeneity is essential for obtaining suitable surface for specific cell growth. Different ink unification processes were tested to achieve appropriate layer homogeneity and resistivity to successfully applied the GNPs layers in neural cell electrostimulation. The GNP coatings were then used to electrostimulate mouse NE-4C neural stem cells. In this study, the authors investigated how the stimulation voltage amplitude's value affects cell behaviour, particularly the number of cells. Sinusoidal alternating current was used for stimulation. Three different values of stimulation voltage amplitude were investigated: 5, 10, and 15 V. It was noticed that a lower stimulation voltage amplitude had the most favourable effect on the stem cell count.

Indexed as

cell electrostimulationgraphene nanoplateletsgraphene substratessonication methodspray-coatingsurfactants

Identifiers

PMID36187345
PMCPMC9523217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.