Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187304›Full record

ArticlePhysica A2022

How do crude oil futures hedge crude oil spot risk after the COVID-19 outbreak? A wavelet denoising-GARCHSK-SJC Copula hedge ratio estimation method.

Pengfei Zhu, Tuantuan Lu, Shenglan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pengfei ZhuSchool of Economics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Tuantuan LuSchool of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shenglan ChenSchool of Economics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current paper, we investigate the problem of how do crude oil futures hedge crude oil spot risk after the COVID-19 outbreak. Specifically, given that noise, conditional higher moments and asymmetric tail dependence may exist in crude oil markets, a Wavelet denoising-GARCHSK-SJC Copula hedge ratio estimation method is proposed to construct hedging portfolios in crude oil markets during the epidemic period. Based on the in-sample and out-of-sample results, the hedging roles of Brent futures and Shanghai crude oil (SC) futures for light and medium crude spots after the COVID-19 outbreak are further researched. The empirical results demonstrate that noise, conditional higher moments and asymmetric tail dependence do exist in crude futures and spots, which have impact on the precision of modeling results. Secondly, the Wavelet denoising-GARCHSK-SJC Copula hedge ratio estimation method outperforms all control groups, obtaining the best in-sample and out-of-sample hedging effectiveness. Finally, it is reported in the in-sample and out-of-sample hedging results that Brent is the optimal futures to hedge light oil, while SC is the optimal futures to hedge medium oil. The paper provides substantial recommendations for policymakers and investors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Crude futuresCrude spotHedging effectivenessWavelet denoising-GARCHSK-SJC Copula hedge ratio estimation method

Identifiers

PMID36187304
PMCPMC9514962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.