Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187302›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2022

Pharmacovigilance: reporting requirements throughout a product's lifecycle.

Sylvia Lucas, Jessica Ailani, Timothy R Smith, Ahmad Abdrabboh, Fei Xue, Marco S Navetta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sylvia LucasUniversity of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3993-9811
Jessica AilaniDepartment of Neurology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Timothy R SmithStudyMetrix Research, St Peters, MO, USA.
Ahmad AbdrabbohNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Fei XueAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Marco S NavettaAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive methods for evaluating safety are needed to objectively assess the full risk profile of a medication. The confidence of the prescribing provider in the safety and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals is extremely important. Pharmacovigilance is a key component of drug safety regulatory processes and is paramount for ensuring the safety profile of medications used to treat patients. All participants in the healthcare system, including healthcare providers and consumers, should understand and meaningfully engage in the pharmacovigilance process; healthcare providers should integrate pharmacovigilance into everyday practice, inviting feedback from patients. This narrative review aims to give an overview of the main topics underlying pharmacovigilance and drug safety in pharmaceutical research phase after the authorization of a drug in the United States. The US Food and Drug Administration guidance and post-approval regulatory actions are considered from an industry perspective. Plain language summary:

Indexed as

adverse drug effectsadverse eventsclinical trialsdrug tolerabilitypharmacovigilancepostmarketingregulatorysafety

Identifiers

PMID36187302
PMCPMC9520146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.