ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
High contrast, isotropic, and uniform 3D-imaging of centimeter-scale scattering samples using structured illumination light-sheet microscopy with axial sweeping.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying single-cell responses to irradiation in 3D.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Image post-processing for SILMAS: structured illumination light sheet microscopy with axial sweeping.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Light-sheet fluorescent microscopy (LSFM) has, in recent years, allowed for rapid 3D-imaging of cleared biomedical samples at larger and larger scale. However, even in cleared samples, multiple light scattering often degrades the imaging contrast and widens the optical sectioning. Accumulation of scattering intensifies these negative effects as light propagates inside the tissue, which accentuates the issues when imaging large samples. With axially swept light-sheet microscopy (ASLM), centimeter-scale samples can be scanned with a uniform micrometric optical sectioning. But to fully utilize these benefits for 3D-imaging in biomedical tissue samples, suppression of scattered light is needed. Here, we address this by merging ASLM with light-sheet based structured illumination into Structured Illumination Light-sheet Microscopy with Axial Sweeping (SILMAS). The SILMAS method thus enables high-contrast imaging, isotropic micrometric resolution and uniform optical sectioning in centimeter-scale scattering samples, creating isotropic 3D-volumes of e.g., whole mouse brains without the need for any computation-heavy post-processing. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in agarose gel phantoms with fluorescent beads, and in an PFF injected alpha-synuclein transgenic mouse model tagged with a green fluorescent protein (SynGFP). SILMAS imaging is compared to standard ASLM imaging on the same samples and using the same optical setup, and is shown to increase contrast by as much as 370% and reduce widening of optical sectioning by 74%. With these results, we show that SILMAS improves upon the performance of current state-of-the-art light-sheet microscopes for large and imperfectly cleared tissue samples and is a valuable addition to the LSFM family.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.