Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187261›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2022

Comparison of wavefront aberrations in the object and image spaces using wide-field individual eye models.

Yongji Liu, Xiaolan Li, Lin Zhang, Xianglong Yi, Yuwei Xing, Kunqi Li, Yan Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yongji LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Micro-scale Optical Information Science and Technology, Institute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Haihe Education Park, Tianjin, 300350, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-7106
Xiaolan LiTianjin Key Laboratory of Micro-scale Optical Information Science and Technology, Institute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Haihe Education Park, Tianjin, 300350, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-2035
Lin ZhangNankai University Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Haihe Education Park, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Xianglong YiNankai University Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Haihe Education Park, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Yuwei XingTianjin Key Laboratory of Micro-scale Optical Information Science and Technology, Institute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Haihe Education Park, Tianjin, 300350, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0755-241X
Kunqi LiTianjin Key Laboratory of Micro-scale Optical Information Science and Technology, Institute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Haihe Education Park, Tianjin, 300350, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9539-0678
Yan WangNankai University Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Haihe Education Park, Tianjin, 300350, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wavefront aberrations in the image space are critical for visual perception, though the clinical available instruments usually give the wavefront aberrations in the object space. This study aims to compare the aberrations in the object and image spaces. With the measured wavefront aberrations over the horizontal and vertical ±15° visual fields, the in-going and out-going wide-field individual myopic eye models were constructed to obtain the wavefront aberrations in the object and image spaces of the same eye over ±45° horizontal and vertical visual fields. The average differences in the mean sphere and astigmatism were below 0.25 D between the object and image spaces over the horizontal and vertical ±45° visual fields under 3 mm and 6 mm pupil diameter. The wavefront aberrations in the object space are a proper representation of the aberrations in the image space at least for horizontal visual fields ranging from -35°to +35° and vertical visual fields ranging from -15°to +15°.

Identifiers

PMID36187261
PMCPMC9484411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.