ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Improvement of neural contrast sensitivity after long-term adaptation in pseudophakic eyes.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Clinical data registry comparing outcomes of two light adjustable lenses.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Basic Optics Underlying Current Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Relumino mode may provide video terminal assistance for the amblyopic patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of long-term neural adaptation to habitual sspherical aberration on through-focus visual acuity in adults.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of Neural Adaptation to Habitual Spherical Aberration on Depth of Focus.Research square · 2024Article
- Introduction to the Feature Issue on Adaptive Optics for Biomedical Applications.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An adaptive optics (AO) system was used to investigate the effect of long-term neural adaptation to the habitual optical profile on neural contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes after the correction of all aberrations, defocus, and astigmatism. Pseudophakic eyes were assessed at 4 and 8 months postoperatively for changes in visual performance. Visual benefit was observed in all eyes at all spatial frequencies after AO correction. The average visual benefit across spatial frequencies was higher in the pseudophakic group (3.31) at 4 months postoperatively compared to the normal group (2.41). The average contrast sensitivity after AO correction in the pseudophakic group improved by a factor of 1.73 between 4 and 8 months postoperatively. Contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes was poorer, which could be attributed to long-term adaptation to the habitual optical profiles before the cataract surgery, in conjunction with age-related vision loss. Improved visual performance in pseudophakic eyes suggests that the aged neural system can be re-adapted for altered ocular optics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.