Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187178›Full record

ArticleAnnals of operations research2022

A simulation-deep reinforcement learning (SiRL) approach for epidemic control optimization.

Sabah Bushaj, Xuecheng Yin, Arjeta Beqiri, Donald Andrews, I Esra Büyüktahtakın

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of operations research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabah BushajDepartment of Management Information Systems and Analytics, School of Business and Economics, SUNY Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-692X
Xuecheng YinYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT USA.
Arjeta BeqiriDepartment of Management Information Systems and Analytics, School of Business and Economics, SUNY Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY USA.
Donald AndrewsTrinity College Dublin, School of Natural Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
I Esra BüyüktahtakınGrado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8928-2638
SUNY Plattsburgh · USTrinity College Dublin · IEVirginia Tech · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we address the controversies of epidemic control planning by developing a novel Simulation-Deep Reinforcement Learning (SiRL) model. COVID-19 reminded constituents over the world that government decision-making could change their lives. During the COVID-19 pandemic, governments were concerned with reducing fatalities as the virus spread but at the same time also maintaining a flowing economy. In this paper, we address epidemic decision-making regarding the interventions necessary given of the epidemic based on the purpose of the decision-maker. Further, we intend to compare different vaccination strategies, such as age-based and random vaccination, to shine a light on who should get priority in the vaccination process. To address these issues, we propose a simulation-deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework. This framework is composed of an agent-based simulation model and a governor DRL agent that can enforce interventions in the agent-based simulation environment. Computational results show that our DRL agent can learn effective strategies and suggest optimal actions given a specific epidemic situation based on a multi-objective reward structure. We compare our DRL agent's decisions to government interventions at different periods of time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results suggest that more could have been done to control the epidemic. In addition, if a random vaccination strategy that allows super-spreaders to get vaccinated early were used, infections would have been reduced by 32% at the expense of 4% more deaths. We also show that a behavioral change of fully quarantining 10% of the risky individuals and using a random vaccination strategy leads to a reduction of the death toll by 14% and 27% compared to the age-based vaccination strategy that was implemented and the New Jersey reported data, respectively. We have also demonstrated the flexibility of our approach to be applied to other locations by validating and applying our model to the COVID-19 case in the state of Kansas.

Indexed as

Agent-based simulationCOVID-19Deep reinforcement learningEpidemic control planningSimulation-deep reinforcement learningVaccination strategy

Identifiers

PMID36187178
PMCPMC9512996
OpenAlexW4297218033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.