Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36187138›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2022

The balbyter ant

Ayse Yilmaz, Yakir Gagnon, Marcus J Byrne, James J Foster, Emily Baird, Marie Dacke

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ayse YilmazLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Yakir GagnonLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Marcus J ByrneSchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
James J FosterLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Emily BairdDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marie DackeLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many insects rely on path integration to define direct routes back to their nests. When shuttling hundreds of meters back and forth between a profitable foraging site and a nest, navigational errors accumulate unavoidably in this compass- and odometer-based system. In familiar terrain, terrestrial landmarks can be used to compensate for these errors and safely guide the insect back to its nest with pin-point precision. In this study, we investigated the homing strategies employed by

Indexed as

antsCamponotus fulvopilosuscue weightingpath integrationshort-range navigationterrestrial landmarks

Identifiers

PMID36187138
PMCPMC9523141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.